Shades of Stokely Carmichael

Dear Readers,

You can find “Shades of Stokely Carmichael,” my commentary on the guest list, and the problems therein, for today’s White House healthcare summit, here:, or see the full post below.


So, like any good policy wonk, first thing this morning, as always, was my coffee and skimming the Washington Post Politics Morning Edition. I was particularly eager to read the Post this morning since, after all the healthcare hullabaloo of the last year, today is: WHITE HOUSE HEALTHCARE SUMMIT DAY.

The relevant Washington Post article turned-out to be: “Democrats Looking Past Summit to Final Talks.” (See here:

The relevant article attachment was: “Guest List,” which connects you to an AP story: “Who’s Invited to the Healthcare Summit.” (See here:

Turns out, 38 people were invited. But who, you ask?

Well, of course, if you’re a regular reader of this column, you’ll be wondering how many women were invited. Girls and guys, hold your breath; here’s your answer: Grand total: Four.

That’s right, four, one of whom is Nancy Pelosi. So, three, count ‘em, three other women members of Congress, (total membership : 535 people), including one, count her, one woman U.S. Senator. That would be Patty Murray (D, WA).

Wait, it gets better: The total number of women invited by the White House, apart from Nancy Pelosi, 0. Yes, that’s right: 0.

You ask about the White House invitation approach; well, here it is, according to the AP, “The White House invited 22 high-ranking lawmakers and also asked each of the top four congressional leaders to designate four more lawmakers for invitations.” (See here:

So, here’s what I saw when I looked at the White House guest list some more: The “lawmakers invited by the White House” are all either in Senate or House leadership, chair committees, or are a “ranking member” of a committee, with one exception.

Guess what, that exception; he’s a guy too: Senator Chris Dodd, member of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, and so unpopular in his home state he’s being forced to retire.

Other members of that Senate committee? Well, for starters, there’s Senator Barbara Mikulski, the next (third) ranking member after Sen Dodd, and then there’s Senator Patty Murray, the fifth ranking member.

But neither Mikulski nor Murray were invited by the White House, even in light of the fact that the issue of women’s health, not to say, abortion rights, is front and center in the debate over healthcare reform.

Murray had to wait to get invited, according to the AP, by “the House and Senate leadership,” along with one other pro-choice Democratic woman, that’s right, one other–Rep. Louis Slaughter.

According to the published reports I can find at this hour (10am CST), the final chapter in this sorry saga was written late yesterday when Rep. John Boehner requested that the White House invite Rep. Bart Stupak, he of the infamous “Stupak Amendment.” (See here:, and here:

Apparently, when the White House was asked about Rep. Boehner’s request, “…the [unnamed White House] official said, “If they want Stupak to come, they can bring him.”

Back-in-the-day, some of us got “fired up and ready to go,” (See here:, in our case, to fight for women’s reproductive rights, because we heard stuff like this: “The proper position of women in SNCC, (the Student Non Violent Coordinating Committee, a leading civil rights organization of the 1960’s civil rights movement) is prone.” (See here: Some say Stokely Carmichael spoke in jest, but what matter?

This all feels like “déjà vu all over again,”* just in a different venue.



White Men Can’t Jump: The Senator John Kyl Edition

Good morning,

So here’s a classic: Check-out today’s USA Today story regarding healthcare reform:

Here’s the key portion of the story:

“Some Republicans, such as Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona, say basic policies shouldn’t be required to include coverage for things that not everyone will use.

“‘I don’t need maternity care and so requiring that to be in my insurance policy is something that I don’t need and will make the policy more expensive,’ Kyl said during a debate about the legislation last week.

‘I think your mom probably did,’ Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., shot back.

“Their spat has become a hit on YouTube, with nearly 150,000 hits as of Sunday.

Here are some of the facts about women and health insurance, as reported in the USA Today story, based on information from The National Women’s Law Center, one of the best organizations around, of any kind. See:

“According to the National Women’s Law Center, a non-partisan legal advocacy group:

“• Forty states and the District of Columbia allow ‘gender ratings,’ in which insurance companies can charge women more for the same health coverage as men and can charge businesses with mostly female workers higher group rates. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, 4.7 million women last year bought individual insurance in states with this pricing practice.

“• In eight states and the District of Columbia, insurance companies can deny coverage to victims of domestic violence.

“• Insurance companies may offer policies that exclude coverage for some pre-existing conditions. If a woman has delivered a baby by cesarean section, for example, companies can deny coverage for future C-sections. In other cases, some insurers will deny maternity coverage if a woman is pregnant when she buys a policy.”

At my recent blogpost for Today’s Chicago Woman:, I begin with the following quote from an amazing woman, Adolphine Fletcher Terry (check-her-out here:

“The men have failed…it’s time to call out the women.”

I’m repeating myself.


P.S. If you have a chance, call Senator Stabenow and Senator Mikuski, and thank them. They are great leaders for all of us.